Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Thread: Back to the 262

  1. #1

    Back to the 262

    Just a quick update . . . .

    Blame Zamex

    Last edited by Jesters-Ink; 9th March 2009 at 00:04.
  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    172
    Downloads
    8
    Uploads
    0

    Re: Back to the 262

    Gorgeous mate. But what else to expect from ya eh?
  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Slovakia
    Posts
    87
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Re: Back to the 262

    What to say... just perfect!
  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,343
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Re: Back to the 262

    Looks great, Jesters.
  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Turin, (Italy)
    Posts
    769
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Re: Back to the 262

    great work Jesters
  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Tamworth, UK
    Posts
    596
    Downloads
    4
    Uploads
    0

    Re: Back to the 262

    bear with me while i get my jaw back from the floor...............ok thats better, very very slick Jester...whats next from you?
  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    ITALY / JAPAN
    Posts
    935
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Re: Back to the 262

    the thin "V" highlight on the tail is a masterpiece touch!

    ....do you mind if I experiment it on my next work?
    Ugo

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,705
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Re: Back to the 262

    Wow, Jesters--Great work as always!

    For your consideration: How about curvature for the wing shadows on the nacelle since the combination of the swept wing and round nacelles create same?

    Man, you do good art!
  9. #9

    Re: Back to the 262

    Wow thanks guys, great encouragement considering I was tearing my hair out over this for the past 2 days.

    To Ugo regarding highlighted V on tail, help yourself and have fun.

    To Vacajun, I did an experiment with a cylinder, a straight edge and a light source a while back and I believe the shadow was also straight. As long as your object is 90 degrees to your viewpoint. I will check this again with a more elaborate experiment when I get chance.
  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,705
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Re: Back to the 262

    Jesters,

    Relative to straight wing shadow lines on curved fuselages: Only true if there is no sweepback to the wing leading edge. Sweep back or forward results in curved shadows on circular fuselages or nacelles. Gamary and I discussed this for while last summer and it drove me to do my own experiment. In the picture, the sun is at the upper right at about the 2 o'clock position shining on my supersonic cardboard tube and business card wings. I used a swept-back, unswept, and swept forward card to demonstrate. Notice the curvature of the shadow and how it is different directions for sweep forward and sweep back, while being straight for an unswept wing.

    As a member of our crazy bunch, this always bothered me and I developed a computer program that will define the shadow lines for various sweeps and fuselage shapes. Boy, am I sick!!!

    There gamary, we've passed the info on!
    Attached Images Attached Images  

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •