Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: BF110s

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    S.-Petersburg, Russia
    Posts
    393
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Re: BF110s

    Looks fine!
    But it's a pity you guys stop making extracted wheels. They give more "detailed" look to the whole work (IMH.
  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Kent, UK
    Posts
    754
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Re: BF110s

    I agree, they are nice for one off low print run specials but when you've got a gazillion profiles to output for book projects the undercarriages are just a waste of time with no real use to the viewer. Plus they take up valuable printed page real estate that could be better used for words/other artwork rather than the same repeated monotonous undercarriages. Pretty much the same for props in general. They don't do nothing...
  3. #13

    Re: BF110s

    Quote Originally Posted by Clint Mitchell View Post
    Pretty much the same for props in general. They don't do nothing...
    Except keep the aircraft in the air

    I tend to just draw the u/c for plans and unless specified don't render them up.
    Harriers...uppy downy things.
  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    between tedium and apathy, with an occasional sidetrip to monotony
    Posts
    1,120
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Re: BF110s

    Ever since I profiled the Fw-190D with its long undercarriage extended, I decided then and there that the single leg dangling in the air just looked daft.

    And like Ink, I wont be doing anymore unless its called for. Props are de rigueur and IMHO profiles look as ridiculous with out them as they do with undercarriage extended.

    Apologies to those that draw their profiles with undercarriages and no props.
  5. #15

    Re: BF110s

    Will confess I've just drawn some down but they were for a Stuka
    Harriers...uppy downy things.
  6. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,343
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Re: BF110s

    Apologies to those that draw their profiles with undercarriages and no props.
    I did a couple Mustangs like this. Some by plain laziness, others by customer request.
  7. #17

    Re: BF110s

    Bringing this one reluctantly back on topic for a quick post, here's a 110 that's been on the beers and it shows A dacklebauch version (no main u/c).
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Harriers...uppy downy things.
  8. #18

    Re: BF110s

    Good stuff!
    Please see Facebook for my latest work: www.facebook.com/aviationart.aero
    or visit my aviation art gallery and web store: www.aviationart.aero
  9. #19

    Re: BF110s

    Ok here's one for you...how do the colours match up, really a bit clueless on this scheme but had a guess and open to options.

    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Harriers...uppy downy things.
  10. #20

    Re: BF110s

    If the markings were painted out like that, wouldn't the base colours be Luftwaffe colours, I wonder?

    If this is 5F+CM, have a look at these images:
    Luftwaffe colours: http://www.asisbiz.com/il2/Bf-110/Bf...r-2177-01.html

    Full RAF colours (the original markings probably invisible) with RAF serial AX772: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...NAN15Dec43.jpg
    Seeing as this was 1943, colours would most likely be day fighter colours (Dark Green and Ocean Grey). Belly indeed yellow.

    Your yellow looks good, your green needs to be warmer though. I reckon a hue shift of -20 would do the trick. Ocean Grey would have a baby blue hue, but very desaturated and quite pale in appearance if heavily worn.
    Last edited by Skyraider3D; 3rd May 2013 at 22:21.
    Please see Facebook for my latest work: www.facebook.com/aviationart.aero
    or visit my aviation art gallery and web store: www.aviationart.aero

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •