hi ugo,
beautifull, now that is how to do a profile, it looks like it is not part of the screen but a real one in front of it, fantastic![]()
hi ugo,
beautifull, now that is how to do a profile, it looks like it is not part of the screen but a real one in front of it, fantastic![]()
JMSmith (back by popular demand)
HY
Nice start.Anyone who has got OH58 Kiowa line drawing?
My favourite chopper. It has looks like someone dropped a tank on it...![]()
Looking good, Ugo!
Ugo,
The master strikes again! Beautiful art
Do me a favor and check the dimensions of the aft end from the engines rearward and the size of the rear rotor transmission pod. The rear end looks much too long (almost enlarged compared to the front end) and the pod IMHO is too big. Looks strange compared to your outstanding SH-60 art.
I really admire your choppers.
Makes my HH-60J look like kindergarten for Noobies!!
Thank You Joe!!
I like your SeaHawk. Each of us has, luckily, different styles.
Regarding your suggestion, I am afraid I didn't understand what part are you talking about. Is it the SH-60 or the HH-60...? could you highlight the points to be checked raughly? Thanks in advance!
Ugo
Ugo,
No one comes close to you in profiling, friend!!Begging your pardon, but for some reason my old eyes think it may be worth looking at the indicated areas on the HH. It appears that the length of the tail section is too long (might be an illusion because of the rotor not being on), the tail rotor pod looks big, and the pivot point of the horizontal might be lower than indicated in the art (look at the Gallery photo of the MH-60, first column, last row), so there is not a large gap between the surface and the lower fuselage fin.
In any event, a few suggestions for your consideration from a faithful disciple!!More! More!
Joe