still working at it,
se'ga se'ga (slowly slowly)![]()
still doing a bit,
but real life and work get in the way, too tired when i get home![]()
JMSmith (back by popular demand)
still working at it,
se'ga se'ga (slowly slowly)![]()
JMSmith (back by popular demand)
I think there is too much concave curve on the upper front part of the tail plane, I can see what you're looking at but from the angle you're looking at it should have a hint of convection. Otherwise all seems fine.
Harriers...uppy downy things.
cheers chris,
methinks there is still too much curve on the top tailplane surface, its a really wierd shape on it.![]()
JMSmith (back by popular demand)
There is a bit of the fuselage skin distorted slightly where it wraps and the photo isn't a true oblique angle but you have a good photo of the tail of XP672, file number Apr12-264 which shows a tighter fit at the root. Could just be that it is at a better angle as well (though not perfect).
Don't forget the small rectangular panel with 6 rivets in just below the fin.
Harriers...uppy downy things.
cheers mate,
will sort that later, i thought it looked wierd, two sets off eyes are better than one![]()
JMSmith (back by popular demand)
Have a bacardi and it'll look fine regardless of what you actually do!
Probably so small it's not worth worrying too much about, just make the line a little darker around the upper tip should be ok!
Harriers...uppy downy things.
sorted that chris,
now then the mystery plate, you took photos of 3 aircraft, 2 had it fitted (both different) and the other notalso the rivets on the rear of the grey scheme one are raised rounded, the other 2 are flush !!!!!!!
![]()
JMSmith (back by popular demand)
IGNORE THAT LAST COMMENT
just looked again and they are all raised rivets![]()
JMSmith (back by popular demand)
playing with the marking colours,
which blue looks right, the roundle or the fin flash![]()
JMSmith (back by popular demand)