Well, guys, it's a good thing your gals aren't reading this thread.
Funny: the very first drawing John posted strikes me as quite good, though I don't know why. What's wrong with it?
Well, guys, it's a good thing your gals aren't reading this thread.
Funny: the very first drawing John posted strikes me as quite good, though I don't know why. What's wrong with it?
here we go,
some of these have been flipped, so they are faceing the right way, also the first two are taken a little low, this means you are not seeing the full amount of curve just behind the spinner.
these are 50% of the originals
JMSmith (back by popular demand)
These pics don’t really help Mr. Smith, they are taken too close to the subject and suffer from lens distortion. I wouldn’t trust a single shape from them. They are good for getting a “feel” for the aircraft, but no use for anything else.
This example would give better results, but the problem here is, its not a war time bird and details would have to be checked thoroughly before proceeding.
Very tricky . . . . . . . .
![]()
thanks jester,
thats exactly the image i was looking for, far enough away and at the right level.
JMSmith (back by popular demand)
i think the next step is to remove eyeball and fit new ones![]()
JMSmith (back by popular demand)
This is especially true for the "B" as most of them had a bit of a "hump" immediately in front the windscreen compared to the D.
A very exhaustive thread here, including some adapted factory drawings starting on page 2.