Page 14 of 14 FirstFirst ... 4 10 11 12 13 14
Results 131 to 134 of 134

Thread: Aussie Mustangs

  1. #131

    Re: Aussie Mustangs

    how much extra weight did it add as it would surly mess up the center of gravity
  2. #132
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,343
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Re: Aussie Mustangs

    Thanks for the answer, Graeme.

    @Inkworm: after reading your question, I went and checked the data before shooting my mouth off but (and this happens from time to time, happily ) my first reaction was correct: a turboprop is generally lighter than a piston engine.

    Merlin 61: 744 kg
    Dart 506: 386 kg

    Which would have screwed up the CG some, put it's easier to advance a lighter engine than to move a heavier one backwards...
    Last edited by gamary; 1st November 2010 at 09:59. Reason: John can't even compete. He's just playing in the wrong playground.
  3. #133

    Re: Aussie Mustangs

    So accounting for the alterations and firewall that you mention the combined weight may well have still been less than the Merlin but come close to it, I'd hazard a guess that the CG wasn't really affected, just visually looks like it!
  4. #134
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    906
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Re: Aussie Mustangs

    Hi Guys,

    I've since found out it DID get as far as engine runs on the ground, but never flew.

    It was estimated it could be good for 500mph.

    CG wasn't affected, thus the positioning. Think of the Pilatus Porter and Turbo-Porter. Same deal. A lighter engine moved well forward gives an unchanged CG.

    Grubby.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •